Real Fiat Bravo fuel consumption
Fiat Bravo real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 19% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2010
Fiat Bravo 2010
Average real petrol consumption difference: +31% Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Bravo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 90 HP MT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+8% |
1.4Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP MT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+22% |
1.4Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 120 HP AT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | |
1.4Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 140 HP MT | Petrol | 5.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+33% |
1.4Fiat Bravo 2010 1.4 150 HP MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | |
1.5Fiat Bravo 2010 1.5 1.6 MT | Petrol | 4.8 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+60% |
1.6Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 AT | Petrol | 4.6 l/100km | |
1.6Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 90 HP MT | Diesel | 4.4 l/100km | |
1.6Fiat Bravo 2010 1.6 105 HP MT | Diesel | 4.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+23% |
2.0Fiat Bravo 2010 2.0 MT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km |
2007
Fiat Bravo 2007
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7% Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Bravo versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 16v MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+7% |
1.4Fiat Bravo 2007 1.4 S AT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | |
1.9Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 115 120 HP MT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km+11% |
1.9Fiat Bravo 2007 1.9 16v Multijet 150 150 HP MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+14% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.