Real Dacia Dokker fuel consumption
Dacia Dokker real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 25% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 21% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 30% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2016
Dacia Dokker 2016 FL
Average real petrol consumption difference: +27% Average real diesel consumption difference: +35%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Dacia Dokker versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Dacia Dokker 2016 1.2 TCe MT | Petrol | 5.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km+37% |
| 1.3Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 TCe 102 Hp 102 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+27% |
| 1.3Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 TCe 131 Hp 131 HP MT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+21% |
| 1.5Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 dCi 75 Hp 75 HP MT | Diesel | 4.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km+40% |
| 1.5Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 dCi 90 Hp 90 HP MT | Diesel | 4.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+33% |
| 1.5Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 Blue dCi 95 HP MT | Diesel | 4.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km+33% |
| 1.6Dacia Dokker 2016 1.6 Sce MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+24% |
2012
Dacia Dokker 2012
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14% Average real diesel consumption difference: +24%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Dacia Dokker versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Dacia Dokker 2013 1.2 MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km+26% |
| 1.5Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 dCi 75 Hp 75 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | |
| 1.5Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 dCi 90 Hp 90 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+24% |
| 1.6Dacia Dokker 2013 1.6 MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+1% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.