Real Citroen C1 fuel consumption
Citroen C1 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 13% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 21% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 5% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Citroen C1 produced from 2005 to 2019. For Citroen C1 produced up to 2012 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +13%, while for those produced after 2012 it is on average +30%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2014
Citroen C1 2014
Average real petrol consumption difference: +36%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 1.0 69 HP MT | 3.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km+32% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 1.0 69 HP AT | 4.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+45% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 Airscape 1.0 VTi 72 HP MT | 3.7 l/100km | |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2018 1.0 VTi 72 HP MT | 3.7 l/100km | |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2018 1.0 VTi 72 HP AT | 4.2 l/100km | |
| 1.2Citroen C1 2014 1.2 MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km+33% |
2014
Citroen C1 2014 3 door
Average real petrol consumption difference: +36%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 1.0 69 HP MT | 3.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km+32% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 1.0 69 HP AT | 4.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+45% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2014 Airscape 1.0 VTi 72 HP MT | 3.7 l/100km | |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2018 Airscape 1.0 VTi 72 HP MT | 3.8 l/100km | |
| 1.2Citroen C1 2014 1.2 MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km+33% |
2012
Citroen C1 2012
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2012 1.0i MT | 4.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+13% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2012 1.0i AT | 4.5 l/100km |
2012
Citroen C1 2012 3 door
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2012 1.0i MT | 4.3 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+19% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2012 1.0i AT | 4.5 l/100km |
2008
Citroen C1 2008
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2008 1.0i AT | 4.6 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km+15% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2008 1.0i MT | 4.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+13% |
2008
Citroen C1 2008
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2008 1.0i MT | 4.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+13% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2008 1.0i AT | 4.6 l/100km |
2005
Citroen C1 2005
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15% Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C1 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0Citroen C1 2005 1.0i AT | Petrol | 4.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+17% |
| 1.0Citroen C1 2005 1.0i MT | Petrol | 4.6 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km+13% |
| 1.4Citroen C1 2006 1.4 HDi MT | Diesel | 4.1 l/100km | 4.3 l/100km+5% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.