Real Chrysler Sebring fuel consumption
Chrysler Sebring real fuel consumption by user reviews is similar compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Chrysler Sebring produced from 1994 to 2010.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2007
Chrysler Sebring 2007 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2007 Hard Top 2.0 CRD 140 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2007 Soft Top 2.0 CRD 140 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 2.4Chrysler Sebring 2007 2.4i 16V AT | 9.5 l/100km | |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2007 2.7i V6 AT | 10.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+7% |
| 3.5Chrysler Sebring 2007 3.5i V6 AT | 11.1 l/100km |
2003
Chrysler Sebring 2003 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2003 2.0i 16V 141 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+4% |
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2003 2.0i 16V 141 HP AT | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2006 2.0i 16V 141 HP MT | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 2.4Chrysler Sebring 2006 2.4i 16V AT | 10.3 l/100km | |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2003 2.7i 24V 203 HP AT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+4% |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2006 2.7i 24V 203 HP AT | 10.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+2% |
2003
Chrysler Sebring 2003 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2003 Cabrio 2.0i 16V 141 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+4% |
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2006 Cabrio 2.0i 16V 141 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2003 Cabrio 2.7i 24V AT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+4% |
2001
Chrysler Sebring 2001 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2001 2.0i 16V MT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2001 2.0i 16V AT | 10.2 l/100km | |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2001 2.7i 24V AT | 10.6 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km+7% |
2001
Chrysler Sebring 2001 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chrysler Sebring 2001 Cabrio 2.0i 16V MT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.7Chrysler Sebring 2001 Cabrio 2.7i 24V AT | 10.6 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km+7% |
2000
Chrysler Sebring 2000 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Sebring versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4Chrysler Sebring 2001 Coupe 2.4 i 16V MT | 10.0 l/100km | |
| 2.4Chrysler Sebring 2001 Coupe 2.4 i 16V AT | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 3.0Chrysler Sebring 2000 Coupe 3.0 V6 24V MT | 10.0 l/100km | |
| 3.0Chrysler Sebring 2000 Coupe 3.0 V6 24V AT | 10.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km-1% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.