Real Chevrolet Tahoe fuel consumption
Chevrolet Tahoe real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 8% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Chevrolet Tahoe produced from 1995 to 2019. For Chevrolet Tahoe produced up to 2007 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +4%, while for those produced after 2007 it is on average +12%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2014
Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
Average real petrol consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Tahoe versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 5.3 EcoTec V8 Automatic 355 HP AT | 11.9 l/100km | |
| 5.3Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 5.3 EcoTec V8 Automatic 4x4 355 HP AT | 12.1 l/100km | |
| 6.2Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 6.2 AT 4x4 | 12.1 l/100km | 13.5 l/100km+12% |
1999
Chevrolet Tahoe 1999
Average real petrol consumption difference: +4%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Tahoe versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 4.8 i V8 278 Hp Automatic 278 HP AT | 12.5 l/100km | |
| 4.8Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 4.8 i V8 4WD 278 Hp Automatic 4x4 278 HP AT | 14.1 l/100km | |
| 4.8Chevrolet Tahoe 2004 4.8 i V8 290 Hp Automatic 290 HP AT | 14.5 l/100km | |
| 4.8Chevrolet Tahoe 2005 4.8 i V8 4WD 290 Hp Automatic 4x4 290 HP AT | 14.5 l/100km | |
| 5.3Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 5.3 AT 4x4 | 15.4 l/100km | 16.0 l/100km+4% |
| 6.0Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 6.0 i V8 AT | 15.7 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.