Real Chevrolet Orlando fuel consumption
Chevrolet Orlando real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 32% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 36% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2011
Chevrolet Orlando 2011
Average real petrol consumption difference: +27% Average real diesel consumption difference: +36%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Orlando versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4Chevrolet Orlando 2013 1.4 MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+44% |
| 1.8Chevrolet Orlando 2011 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+19% |
| 1.8Chevrolet Orlando 2011 1.8 Automatic AT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 130 Hp 130 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+42% |
| 2.0Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 163 Hp 163 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+25% |
| 2.0Chevrolet Orlando 2011 2.0D 163 Hp Automatic 163 HP AT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+40% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.