Real Chevrolet Kalos fuel consumption
Chevrolet Kalos real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 12% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2005
Chevrolet Kalos 2005 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Kalos versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.1 1.2 MT | 6.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+9% |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 83 HP MT | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 16V 94 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+13% |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2007 1.4 16V 94 HP AT | 7.6 l/100km |
2005
Chevrolet Kalos 2005 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Kalos versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 83 HP MT | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 16V 94 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+13% |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 16V 94 HP AT | 7.6 l/100km |
2005
Chevrolet Kalos 2005 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Kalos versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.1 1.2 Pure MT | 6.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+9% |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2005 1.4 16V MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+13% |
| 1.4Chevrolet Kalos 2007 1.4 16V AT | 7.6 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.