Real Chevrolet Epica fuel consumption
Chevrolet Epica real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 7% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 4% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 10% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2006
Chevrolet Epica 2006
Average real petrol consumption difference: +4% Average real diesel consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chevrolet Epica versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0Chevrolet Epica 2006 2.0 MT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Chevrolet Epica 2007 2.0 VCDI MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+13% |
| 2.0Chevrolet Epica 2007 2.0 VCDI Automatic AT | Diesel | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+7% |
| 2.5Chevrolet Epica 2006 2.5 AT | Petrol | 9.3 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+4% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.