Real Alfa Romeo GT fuel consumption
Alfa Romeo GT real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 6% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines similar to manufacturer's stated consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2007
Alfa Romeo GT 2007
Average real petrol consumption difference: +16% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Alfa Romeo GT versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7Alfa Romeo GT 2007 1.7 1.8 T.Spark 16V MT | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 1.9Alfa Romeo GT 2007 1.9 JTDm 16V MT | Diesel | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km-1% |
| 2.0Alfa Romeo GT 2007 2.0 JTS 16V MT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km+16% |
| 2.0Alfa Romeo GT 2007 2.0 JTS 16V Selespeed AT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 3.2Alfa Romeo GT 2007 3.2 V6 24V MT | Petrol | 12.0 l/100km |
2004
Alfa Romeo GT 2004
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Alfa Romeo GT versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7Alfa Romeo GT 2006 1.7 1.8 T.Spark 16V MT | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 1.9Alfa Romeo GT 2004 1.9 JTD 16V MT | Diesel | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km-1% |
| 2.0Alfa Romeo GT 2004 2.0 JTS 16V MT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+15% |
| 2.0Alfa Romeo GT 2004 2.0 JTS 16V Selespeed AT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 3.2Alfa Romeo GT 2004 3.2 V6 24V MT | Petrol | 12.4 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km+2% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.