Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 20 HP less power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Dacia Logan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 163 mm (6.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`163 kg | 1`060 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 497 kg | 540 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 340 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |