Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 49 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 109 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | Used also on Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 184 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 221 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |