Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 2006 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 2003 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 161 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 250 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.8 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4 2006. On average, Toyota RAV4 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 2006 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 2003 is 17 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 2006, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 678 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1909 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota RAV4 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 2003 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 2003 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4 2006, which means Toyota RAV4 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`836 kg | ~ 2`134 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`376 kg | ~ 1`538 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 460 kg | ~ 596 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Toyota RAV4 2006. Therefore, Toyota RAV4 2006 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |