Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 2 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 23 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 107 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |