Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 120 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |