Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 35 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 167 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |