Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 9 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 33 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |