Mazda 323 1998 vs Ford Fiesta 1999

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Ford Fiesta
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 88 HP90 HP
Torque: 132 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds11.4 seconds
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, but torque is 7 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.56.9
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 323 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 323 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway700 km on highway
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m3.83 m
Width: 1.70 m1.63 m
Height: 1.40 m1.32 m
Mazda 323 is larger.
Mazda 323 is 21 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data930 litres
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 323 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta.
Gross weight (kg): 1`585no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv