Ford Fiesta 1999 Hatchback
Very convenient, cheap cost, feminine, economic
read all Ford Fiesta reviews
This generation of Ford Fiesta has been produced from January, 1999 to June, 2002. We can provide information about 7 modifications of this generation. The car has been produced only with front wheel drive.
This Ford is available with four petrol engines with displacement from 1.2 to 1.6 litres and power of from 60 to 103 horsepower un two diesel engines with displacement 1.8 litres and power of from 60 to 75 horsepower.
The car is available with both manual (6 versions), as well as automatic (1 version) gearbox.
Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback average fuel consumption in combined cycle for petrol engine is from 6.9 to 7.3 litres per 100km, whereas for diesel engine - from 5.3 to 6.1 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback petrol engine version is Ford Fiesta 1.3i 16V, consuming 6.9 litres per 100km. While the most fuel efficient Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback diesel - Ford Fiesta 1.8 DI for 100 kilometers consumes 5.3 liters of diesel.
According to user reviews, Ford Fiesta real-world fuel consumption is on average about approximately for 6 percents higher as the manufacturer's claimed fuel economy (on average the same for petrol engines and +10% for diesel engines). For a more detailed actual fuel economy of each model, select a specific Ford Fiesta modification.
Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback CO2 emissions for petrol engine are from 161 to 167 grams per kilometer, whereas for diesel engine - from 144 to 161 grams per kilometer. From Ford Fiesta with petrol engines the lowest CO2 emissions has Ford Fiesta 1.3i 16V which produces an average of 161 grams of CO2 per kilometer. In turn, from the Ford Fiesta diesels least CO2 distributes Ford Fiesta 1.8 DI - 144 grams per km.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 10.2 seconds has Ford Fiesta 1.6 16V Sport version, conversely the tardiest one is Ford Fiesta 1.8 D reaching this speed only in 17.5 seconds. The maximum top speed is 182 km/h for the 1.6 petrol 4-cylinder 103 hp version (Ford Fiesta 1.6 16V Sport).
Lenght of Ford Fiesta is 383 cm, it is small car. Ford Fiesta gross weight is from 1450 to 1510 kg (depending on modification), which is approximately the same as the average for cars of this age and class. Ford Fiesta trunk space is 250 litres, by folding down all rear seats boot capacity can be increased to 930 litres.
This Ford is in average price group - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 850 €. Users calculated Ford Fiesta 1999 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 1800 € cost per year and 0.34 € cost per one kilometer. Fuel costs were estimated at around 51%, while repair and maintenance costs - around 28% from total. We have an excellent car cost calculator, calculate ownership costs of Ford Fiesta for your situation and driving habits here! Below you will find more detailed information about Ford Fiesta prices and costs.
Ford Fiesta modifications
| Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ford Fiesta 1999 1.2 1.3i 16V
Oct 1999 — Jun 2002 Most fuel efficient petrol version |
1.2 Petrol | 75 HP | 6.9 l/100km | Manual (5) |
|
Ford Fiesta 1999 1.2 1.3i 16V
Oct 1999 — Mar 2000 Only version with automatic transmission |
1.2 Petrol | 75 HP | 7.1 l/100km | Automatic |
|
Ford Fiesta 1999 1.3i
Nov 1999 — Jun 2002 Most fuel efficient petrol version |
1.3 Petrol | 60 HP | 6.9 l/100km | Manual (5) |
|
Ford Fiesta 1999 1.4i 16V
Oct 1999 — Aug 2000 Most fuel efficient petrol version |
1.4 Petrol | 90 HP | 6.9 l/100km | Manual (5) |
|
Ford Fiesta 1999 1.6 16V Sport
Jan 1999 — Dec 2001 Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 10.2 seconds |
1.6 Petrol | 103 HP | 7.3 l/100km | Manual (5) |
| Ford Fiesta 1999 1.8 D Oct 1999 — Mar 2000 | 1.8 Diesel | 60 HP | 6.1 l/100km | Manual (5) |
|
Ford Fiesta 2000 1.8 DI
Mar 2000 — Jun 2002 Most powerfull diesel version (75 HP) |
1.8 Diesel | 75 HP | 5.3 l/100km | Manual (5) |
Ford Fiesta safety
During safety testing Ford Fiesta has obtained 3 stars from five, which means average safety level.
Adults (driver and passenger) safety of Ford Fiesta is evaluated with three stars, and for pedestrian protection Ford Fiesta got one star.
Ford Fiesta prices
Ford Fiesta 1999 - 2002 hatchback price in Latvia is from 200 € to 1400 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Ford Fiesta price is more below average - Ford Fiesta is approximately for 14 percents cheaper then average hatchbacks of this age (compare hatchbacks 1999 - 2002 prices).
| Year | Lowest | Average | Highest | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Fiesta 2002 price | 700 € | 1000 € | 1400 € | |
| Ford Fiesta 2000 price | 600 € | 800 € | 1000 € | |
| Ford Fiesta 1999 price | 200 € | 700 € | 1200 € |
Ford Fiesta total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Ford Fiesta? Users calculated Ford Fiesta 1999 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 1800 € cost per year and 0.34 € cost per one kilometer.
Ford Fiesta 1999 total costs of ownership calculator
Calculate total cost of ownership of the Ford Fiesta, including purchase, insurance, maintenance, taxes and other costs based on how you use your vehicle.
Ford Fiesta reliability and quality
According to yearly reports of vehicle inspection service Ford Fiesta reliability is below average. In the roadworthiness tests in 2013 defects were detected in an average of 31.2 percent of Ford Fiesta of this generation (on average 13 years old at the time of inspection). The average failure rate for a vehicles of the same age was 27.6%.
Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback features (options)
Percentage of Ford Fiesta with corresponding feature (option)
54% Conditioning
44% Adjustable steering wheel
21%
Ford Fiesta 1999 hatchback photo images
Similar cars to Ford Fiesta 1999
Cars similar and most compared to Ford Fiesta 1999. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- higher safety
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption
- roomier boot
- lower price
- higher safety
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- lower fuel consumption
- manual gearbox only
- only petrol engines available
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- roomier boot
- available with 4x4 drive
- higher safety
Ford Fiesta reviews
Total 9 Ford Fiesta owner reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Ford Fiesta.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 150 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very convenient, cheap cost, feminine, economic
Cons: For city more would be suitable with automatic gearbox
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 30 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1340 € (~ 134 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 117`000 kilometers (15 years) |
|---|
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 80`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 620 € (~ 88 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good handling. Sturdy suspension. After 240,000 km, still have the original lever bushings, although a lot of driving on dirt roads. Original clutch still on the robot-gearbox. Good visibility. Rust-resistant bodywork throughout.
Cons: Loud, no sound insulation. The robot gearbox is twitchy, but you can get used to handling it. Eats oil - about 100 g per 1000 km.
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 55`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 330 € (~ 66 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A small, brisk and reliable. Very comfortable, despite its modest size.
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 14`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 45 € (~ 15 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good compact car, just for a woman.
Cons: The rubber is on inside, and so in wet weather, thresholds are always dirty. My previous car was Toyota Corolla - never had such problems. Also a bit noisy inside, because of plastic parts in doorway
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.3 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 50`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The ideal car both inside and outside city, because small, maneuvering, economical and comfortable enough. I dont get tired even in long-term trips. For long journeys there is desirable elbow support, which this class of car (second-hand) is rare option. If you want to reach 4.3 average consumption from 1 litre ECOboost engine, you will have to try very hard. Let us be realistic - on average below 5,1 litres will be difficult to crawl. After 50 000 km nothing rattles, rolling perfect. With an engine no problems at all. 1L ECOboost is recognised as one of Ford's most successful engine models, which was gutted after tests over 300 000 km and no critical issues were identified. If you are over 1.8m, than behind you can only sit children, or you will go closer to steering wheel. Anyway, I'm Happy Happy Happy with his small compact car... in addition, it is a visually attractive.
Cons: Not much else to add a negative way, except that stated average fuel consumption in 4.3L is a rather utopic.