Mazda 323 1998 vs Ford Fiesta 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 88 HP | 60 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 132 NM | 103 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 16.8 seconds | 10.2 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.4 | 5.3 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda 323 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Mazda 323 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Mazda 323 is larger. Mazda 323 is 21 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 323 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
|
Mazda 323 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 323 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`595 | ~ 1`476 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |