Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Citroen C4 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 305 NM | 133 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | 9.2 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 6.7 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 7 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1023 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 80 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`784 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |