Citroen C4 2008 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 - 320 NM | 128 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14 seconds | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.7 | 5.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Bravo. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is smaller. Citroen C4 is 7 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1023 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Citroen C4 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`784 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |