Nissan Qashqai 2021
For me, a flawless car, both technically and visually. I like the big, attractive steering wheel. The new Qashqai seems to have improved driveability thanks to Nissan's ride control system. The car body shakes less on rough roads when compared to the older models. Like lots of other things too - 360 camera, self-dimming mirror, split climate control, extreme braking.
read all Nissan Qashqai reviews
This Nissan is available with two petrol engines with displacement 1.3 litres and power of from 140 to 158 horsepower.
The car is available with both manual (2 versions), as well as automatic (2 versions) gearbox.
Nissan Qashqai 2021 average fuel consumption in combined cycle is from 5.5 to 6.2 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Nissan Qashqai 2021 version is Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T, consuming 5.5 litres of petrol per 100km.
According to user reviews, Nissan Qashqai real-world fuel consumption is on average about approximately for 23 percents higher as the manufacturer's claimed fuel economy. For a more detailed actual fuel economy of each model, select a specific Nissan Qashqai modification.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 9.2 seconds has Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T version, conversely the tardiest one is Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T reaching this speed only in 10.2 seconds. The maximum top speed is 206 km/h for the 1.3 petrol 4-cylinder 158 hp version (Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T).
Lenght of Nissan Qashqai is 443 cm, it is medium size car. Nissan Qashqai gross weight is from 1935 to 2040 kg (depending on modification), which is approximately the same as the average for cars of this age and class.
This Nissan is in average price group - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 30 500 €. Below you will find more detailed information about Nissan Qashqai prices and costs.
Nissan Qashqai modifications
Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox | Drive type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 DIG-T
Most fuel efficient version by real consumption |
1.3 Petrol | 140 HP | 5.8 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 DIG-T | 1.3 Petrol | 158 HP | 5.6 l/100km | Manual (6) | Front wheel |
Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 DIG-T
Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 9.2 seconds |
1.3 Petrol | 158 HP | 5.5 l/100km | Automatic | Front wheel |
Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 DIG-T 4x4 | 1.3 Petrol | 158 HP | 6.2 l/100km | Automatic | All wheel |
Nissan Qashqai safety
During safety testing Nissan Qashqai has obtained 5 stars from five, which means very high safety level.
Adults (driver and passenger) safety of Nissan Qashqai is evaluated with outstanding rate 91 from 100, children safety: outstanding mark - 91 from 100, for pedestrian protection Nissan Qashqai got 70 points from 100.
Nissan Qashqai safety equipment has been rated as outstanding - 95 percents from 100.
Nissan Qashqai prices
Nissan Qashqai 2021 crossover price in Latvia is from 22000 € to 34000 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Nissan Qashqai price is average - Nissan Qashqai is approximately for 19 percents cheaper then average crossovers of this age (compare crossovers 2021 - 2023 prices). Despite of relatively low price Nissan Qashqai quality is above average (see below), so this Nissan can be a good buy.
Year | Lowest | Average | Highest | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nissan Qashqai 2023 price | 29 500 € | 31 500 € | 33 000 € | |
Nissan Qashqai 2022 price | 29 000 € | 32 000 € | 34 000 € | |
Nissan Qashqai 2021 price | 22 000 € | 28 000 € | 31 000 € |
Nissan Qashqai total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Nissan Qashqai? To calculate the Nissan Qashqai total running costs, including the purchase, insurance, maintenance costs as well as taxes and other costs, click year of production
Nissan Qashqai 2021 Nissan Qashqai 2022
Nissan Qashqai 2021 features (options)
Percentage of Nissan Qashqai with corresponding feature (option)
99% Climate control
90% Distance control
88% Rain sensor
87% Conditioning
75% Metallic paint
70%
Nissan Qashqai 2021 photo images
Similar cars to Nissan Qashqai 2021
Cars similar and most compared to Nissan Qashqai 2021. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- lower price
- petrol and diesel engines available
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- roomier boot
- petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
- petrol and diesel engines available
- lower price
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- petrol, diesel, hybrid and electric engines available
- petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
- roomier boot
- petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
- roomier boot
Nissan Qashqai reviews
Total 30 Nissan Qashqai owner reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Nissan Qashqai.
Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 18`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 4.9 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 10 € (~ 10 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: For me, a flawless car, both technically and visually. I like the big, attractive steering wheel. The new Qashqai seems to have improved driveability thanks to Nissan's ride control system. The car body shakes less on rough roads when compared to the older models. Like lots of other things too - 360 camera, self-dimming mirror, split climate control, extreme braking.
Cons: As for the car's fuel consumption - as far as I understand, in the past the fuel consumption per 100km factory was determined by the NEDC protocol, which was basically the number that represents the lowest possible fuel consumption for your car. Now the new models sold are with the WLTP protocol, which has been measured in a wide variety of real-world usage conditions and can be said to be an average but much more realistic figure. I just want to say that blaming the factory doesn't make sense, but you have to try, test your own driving style and circumstances.
Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 26`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.8 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Excellent balance of suspension and very pleasant engine, very good readability and grip on the road. Economical, tested - 5.8 liters per 100km from Riga to Jurmala. However, everyday gasoline consumption is slightly different, as it also depends on driving style. Quiet, comfortable salon. Although I do not complain about the sound, I have a good tire Goodyear, then by 50% further reduce their slight noise. The sound system is good, it was possible to get an excellent audio system as well, but it was an optional extra.
Cons: Radio perception - There have been hitches, but there is no such thing as an unsolvable problem. A shark-type antenna further amplified their signal.
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 45`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Bought because wife very liked Qashqai design. Well, we thought price is not high, almost a jeep, lets take for her pleasure. We took the 1.2 version with all extras, brand new from dealer. Wife had pleasure for a week. The first repair at our expense, since guarantee is something else at dealers understanding. And so it was for 1,5 years, from which only 1 a week with joy.
Cons: The quality of Qashqai limps because produced (all of which are traded on LV) in Russia. Now think yourselves or is it worth it. I gave car to another car dealer, no matter how hard he didnt wanted it. I know thet my white Qashqai is recently sold for third time in a row.
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 5`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Nothing positive, very low quality, Nissan dealer couldn't solve problems
Cons: 2 x greater fuel consumption than manufacturer’ s stated. Rust on every door, low quality audio system, arch treatment - hears smallest rock, low quality colour and anti-rust treatment, also features an outdoor temperature sensor, replaced gear box, 2x painted, regulated, that's all new car!
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 15`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 1730 € (~ 865 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Roomy interior and trunk only.
Cons: I never thought that buying a new car will get headache at times. Don't advise anyone to take a 1.2 litre version with 6-speed gear box. Well that we have to give her back to dealer, but already at a lower price. Nissan will no longer be my choice ever. A terrible quality and car.
Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Overall, a very good package and price / performance ratio.
Cons: Higher fuel consumption than stated by manufacturer (2-3l / 100km on average more). Problems with radio. Archs on rural roads are really loud.
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 1 year |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I agree with what many say about this car - a very good price-quality ratio. For such car - high sitting position, sufficiently spacious, beautiful design, both internally and externally. A good standard equipment. Easy to run, steering wheel is spinning very easily.
Cons: Very hard suspension, feels slightest hole and sit through. Bad picks up radio stations - receiver reinstalled, nothing changed. Radio station "alternate" function on wrong work - forcing radio stations ahead, beyond 3. channel doesn't work. If forces of other end, trapped for 6. station. The poor quality sound system - at basses. Incomplete Bluetooth system - sometimes mixes with phone. Incoming call does not display name of contact, only one number. Halogen passing very weak, poorly lit path. Cabin plastics rattles and door panels. Badly insulated archs, driving along a dirt road, very hears slightest little stone that hits arches, as well as driving through wet snow or puddles, it creates a lot of noise in lounge. Annoying headlamp washers - totally unnecessary extra, which only consumes window cleaning fluid, but taking advantage of it, lamp does not make any clean water as well as in winter snow freezes and consists of a layer of ice reducing visibility to lamps.
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 33`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.1 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Well,
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 55`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 4.6 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If you buy, then diesel with a AT, simplest version without KeylessGo because less to be repaired - all of this cosmic technology
Cons: I would wish, better quality of Nissan.... but price says everything.
Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 3 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Runs very well up to 100km/h. At 90km/h engine RPM is just 1900 - incredibly low for 1.2 engine. Great car for city.
Cons: Certainly won't fit for highway, after 110-120km/h no more acceleration.
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 38`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 100 € (~ 33 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The idea is good, options also, but performances not so great.
Cons: Soft body. Weak diesel ecology - 38000 km and 2 times EGR problem and dead soot filter!!! I want to get rid of.
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 80 € (~ 20 € per year) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Rich extra equipment
Cons: Soft body; fragile soot filter
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Lot of extras
Cons: Soft body
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 2 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 5.2 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A good setting.
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 54`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.5 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 24`000 kilometers (0 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 1500 € |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 2 years) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (5 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 670 € (~ 134 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (5 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Total cost of repairs: | 90 € (~ 18 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Large clearance, low fuel consumption, high capacity
Cons: The official maintenance is expensive
Purchase year: | 2020 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 70`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 4 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 55 € (~ 27 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Secure
Cons: Low Power