Nissan Qashqai 2021 vs Volvo XC40 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 158 HP | 129 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 270 NM | 245 - 660 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 10.2 seconds | 4.9 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.2 | 5.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC40 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1447 litres | 1336 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 19 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`974 | ~ 2`282 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |