Ford EcoSport 2017 second hand price
Ford EcoSport 2017 average price is 7500 $.
Over the last year prices for a second hand Ford EcoSport 2017 (model year 2012) have been recorded as being between 6500 $ and 8500 $.
The average price for similar 2017 second hand cars is 12000 $, so this year's Ford EcoSport is approximately for 38 percents cheaper.
The Ford EcoSport 2017 has limited availability on the used car market. Of this generation of Ford EcoSport, the 2015 model year is the most available with an average price of 7500 $.
In year 2017 next Ford EcoSport generation (model year 2017) was also produced with current average price of 8500 $. More information - Ford EcoSport from 2017 manufactured in 2017 price.
Despite its low price, the Ford EcoSport quality is good. In the roadworthiness tests in 2022 defects were detected in an average of 6.1 percent of Ford EcoSport of this generation (on average 8 years old at the time of inspection). The average failure rate for a vehicles of the same age was 8%, such a Ford could be a worthwhile buy.The Ford EcoSport 2017 has limited availability on the used car market. Of this generation of Ford EcoSport, the 2015 model year is the most available with an average price of 7500 $.
Prices of similar 2017 cars
Jeep Renegade
2014 model year Average price: 10000 $
more expensive by 35% Jeep Renegade 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Jeep Renegade Jeep Renegade has
2014 model year Average price: 10000 $
more expensive by 35% Jeep Renegade 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Jeep Renegade Jeep Renegade has
- more power
- more dynamic
- has 4x4 drive
- higher ground clearance
- roomier boot
- higher children safety
- better safety assist technologies
Skoda Yeti
2013 model year Average price: 9000 $
more expensive by 20% Skoda Yeti 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Skoda Yeti Skoda Yeti has
2013 model year Average price: 9000 $
more expensive by 20% Skoda Yeti 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Skoda Yeti Skoda Yeti has
- more power
- more dynamic
- has 4x4 drive
- better manoeuvrability
- higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda CX-3
2014 model year Average price: 13000 $
more expensive by 75% Mazda CX-3 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 has
2014 model year Average price: 13000 $
more expensive by 75% Mazda CX-3 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 has
- more power
- better safety assist technologies
- fewer faults
Opel Mokka X
Average price: 10500 $
more expensive by 40% Opel Mokka 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Opel Mokka Opel Mokka has
more expensive by 40% Opel Mokka 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Opel Mokka Opel Mokka has
- more power
- more dynamic
- roomier boot
- higher carrying (cargo) capacity
- better safety assist technologies
- fewer faults
Opel Crossland
2017 model year Average price: 9000 $
more expensive by 20% Opel Crossland 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Opel Crossland Opel Crossland has
2017 model year Average price: 9000 $
more expensive by 20% Opel Crossland 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Opel Crossland Opel Crossland has
- more dynamic
- lower fuel consumption
- more full fuel tank mileage
- roomier boot
- higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 model year Average price: 16000 $
more expensive by 115% Mitsubishi ASX 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX Mitsubishi ASX has
2012 model year Average price: 16000 $
more expensive by 115% Mitsubishi ASX 2017 price Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX Mitsubishi ASX has
- more power
- has 4x4 drive
- roomier boot
- higher carrying (cargo) capacity