Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 LPG | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 45 HP less power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 15 NM more than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 23 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`760 kg | 1`842 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`372 kg | 1`375 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 388 kg | 467 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Opel Mokka is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford EcoSport scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |