Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 5 HP less power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Opel Crossland. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 6 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1255 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`760 kg | 1`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`372 kg | 1`214 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 388 kg | 606 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 56 procentiem less than Opel Crossland. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Ford EcoSport has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Crossland, so Ford EcoSport quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |