Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 55 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 5 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | no data | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.55 m | |
| Ford EcoSport and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 17 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda CX-3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |