Volvo S40
Volvo S40 technical data
Please choose Volvo S40 generation to gain full info - reviews, technical specifications, prices, quality and safety data, options and photos
Volvo S40 reviews
Total 20 Volvo S40 owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2022 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 11`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.4 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good car. Visually beautiful. Small but compact, will fit tall dudes (the fifth one will have to make his own way). Can't complain about boot space. Excellent if you're a student, not too expensive to maintain. Parts are relatively cheap. I've only changed one bearing in 9 months. The 2-litre diesel is economical and reasonably peppy. I use it a lot as I work as a courier - no major problems. If you look after it regularly, it will last a long time, as with any car. Of the 4 cars I have owned at a fairly young age, this has definitely been the most reliable.
Cons: Incomprehensible electronics. Rust will do its work in time, but only around one arch for now. I'm 1.90m so it tends to be a bit tight, but I'm not complaining too much. Has become a bit sluggish due to turbine wear. Visibility is kind of the same, but you can get by.
| Purchase year: | 2005 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 315`000 kilometers (15 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1705 € (~ 113 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Car compatibility on poor roads, perfect anti-skid system, reliability of car systems, comfortable seats, good looks. 5-cylinder engine sound and power. With a gas system (from 170000km), the fuel costs are similar to those of the D1.6 engine, but the power have not changed.
Cons: Low rack, Large window brackets for poor visibility at intersections, but security requires its own.
| Purchase year: | 2011 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 160`000 kilometers (8 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 800 € (~ 100 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: I have owned several cars, but now this car costs much, much cheaper than the Golf4.
Cons: The hub bearings at the front often need to be changed, the rest everything is o.k.
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 120`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1315 € (~ 219 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Do not corrode, perfect acoustics, sufficiently powerfull.
Eur 17 to 400 km if driving with gas. In any case, very good buy.
Cons: Low, little pockets where to put in something.
| Purchase year: | 2005 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 300`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1400 € (~ 127 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: For our roads, perfect. A very good anti-slip system.
Cons: Electronic problems. It is difficult to find mechanic, who really knows what to do.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 5 years) | Owned for: | 42`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 640 € (~ 320 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Stable, quiet, economical, a good navigation panel
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 1`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 330 € (~ 330 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Reliable, economical