Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 TSI 4Motion R

More on Volkswagen Golf 2017 reviews prices reliability safety photos

Volkswagen Golf 2017 2.0 petrol description

Hatchback Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 TSI 4Motion R is being produced from January, 2017. It has petrol engine with displacement of 2.0 litres, which produces power of 310 horsepower on 5500 rpm - this is the most powerfull Volkswagen Golf 2017 version and torque 400 Nm (Newton metres) on 1800 revolutions per minute.

Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 TSI 4Motion R has all four wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) and automatic gearbox with 6 gears.
Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 TSI 4Motion R accelerates to speed 100 kilometres per hour in 4.6 seconds. The maximum speed of this car is 250 km/h.

In combined cycle (city and motorway), the Volkswagen Golf 2017 1.4 TSI 4Motion R fuel consumption is 7 litres per 100km (14.3 km/l), fuel consumption in city - 8.7 l/100km, highway fuel economy - 6 l/100km. Fuel tank capacity is 55 litres or 14.53 gallons, which gives a mileage up to 780 kilometers without refueling in urban cycle and even up to 900 kilometers on highway.
According to user reviews, this Volkswagen (VW) real everyday fuel consumption is 8.9 litres per 100 km, which is 27% more than the manufacturer's stated. More - Real Volkswagen Golf fuel consumption.

Volkswagen Golf safety

During safety testing Volkswagen Golf has obtained 5 stars from five, which means very high safety level.
Adults (driver and passenger) safety of Volkswagen Golf is evaluated with outstanding rate 95 from 100, children safety: very good mark - 89 from 100, for pedestrian protection Volkswagen Golf got 76 points from 100.
Volkswagen Golf safety equipment has been rated as good - 78 percents from 100.

With the same engine there is also Volkswagen Golf version with manual gearbox (Volkswagen Golf 2017 2.0 TSI 4Motion R MT 4x4) available, which is more sluggish, reaching 100 km/h 0.5 seconds later (in 5.1 seconds), moreover, it is less economic with manufacturer's fuel consumption is higher by 0.9 litres per 100 km or 13 % - 7.9 litres per 100 km, whereas users reported real fuel consumption is higher by 0.2 litres per 100 km or 2 % - 9.1 litres per 100 km.