Land Rover Freelander
Land Rover Freelander technical data
Select Land Rover Freelander generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Land Rover Freelander a reliable car?
Overall, the reliability of the Land Rover Freelander is average. The number of defects found on the Land Rover Freelander during the annual technical checkups is about average for a car of its age.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Land Rover Freelander generation from 1998 to 2000, but the lowest reliability had models from model year 2002 to 2003, reliability scores vary quite significantly between generations of Land Rover Freelander. For more information, check the respective generation information.
Land Rover Freelander reviews
Total 12 Land Rover Freelander owner reviews
Pros: The driver has good visibility and can safely drive on forest paths. My wife is a mushroom picker, so this model was chosen after virtually everything on the market. The SD4 version with 190 horses is dynamic, with no turbo gap feeling - just like a foot pedal, it immediately starts to take off. The brown leather version of the HSE looks quite elegant in the cabin.
Cons: There have been no major repairs except for the central differential box. I was surprised when it started dripping and roaring around 120´000km. No other model has experienced such damage before.The rear wiper motor had run out and the tailgate knob had stopped - when I replaced, I could see the cause immediately - dust and oxidation. Engineers put the wrong materials ... 19 inch tires are quite expensive.
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 1 year) | Owned for | 154`000 kilometers (7 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1275 € (~ 182 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Not a favourite with thieves, so can be left unlocked ;) For me, ideal for trailer trips to my country estate.
Cons: There are weak spots from birth that need to be looked after. Aftermarket parts are a waste of money, buy only original or good brand analogue. Over 10 years the car has eaten up in repairs 10 times the purchase figure, which is the total value of a new car.
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 12 years) | Owned for | 230`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 8 years) | Owned for | 15`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Beautiful and comfortable suv, machine according to price.
| Purchase year: | 2017 age of car 15 years) | Owned for | 165`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 100 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: good
Cons: Periodic maintenance does not exist in Libya
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 8 years) | Owned for | 4`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 3800 € (~ 3800 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Appearance
Cons: Expensive maintenance, unreliable car
| Purchase year: | 2013 age of car 9 years) | Owned for | 150`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.2 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Do maintenance, fill up and drive
| Purchase year: | 2014 age of car 5 years) | Owned for | 25`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Car for human comforts:)