Volvo XC90 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC90 engine produces 27 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.1 | |
| Volvo XC90 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1934 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space (by 21 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |