Volvo XC90 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Volvo XC90 engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Volvo XC90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC90 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 249 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 600 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1150 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space (by 40 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 687 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |