Volvo XC90 2010 vs Audi Q7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q7 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.2 | 3.0 - 5.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 243 HP | 204 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 420 NM | 360 - 1000 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | 5.5 - 9.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.5 | 7.2 - 12.7 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q7. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 205 - 240 mm (8.1 - 9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is smaller, but higher. Volvo XC90 is 28 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 2035 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 175 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`718 | ~ 3`123 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |