Volvo V70 1997 vs Volvo V70 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 1997 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 1997 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V70 2000, but torque is 14 NM less than Volvo V70 2000. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo V70 1997 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 1997 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 1997 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 850, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo V70 2000 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V70 2000 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.49 m | |
| Volvo V70 1997 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70 2000, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 1997 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 2000 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V70 1997 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70 2000. This could mean that the Volvo V70 1997 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 2000 (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 1997 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70 2000, which means Volvo V70 1997 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |