Volvo S80 2009 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 285 HP | 122 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 200 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | 6.1 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 11.3 | 4.1 - 5.3 | |
|
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo S80 is larger. Volvo S80 is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 586 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 106 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`168 | ~ 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |