Volvo S60 2005 vs Volvo S60 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 2005 engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo S60 2002, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo S60 2002. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Volvo S60 2005 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 2005 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S60 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 2005 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1034 litres | 1034 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`535 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 495 kg | 430 kg | |
| Volvo S60 2005 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Volvo S60 2002. Therefore, Volvo S60 2005 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |