Volvo S60 2005 vs Volkswagen Jetta 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 80 HP more power than Volkswagen Jetta, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Volkswagen Jetta. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
1090 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Jetta, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1034 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Jetta has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 has 103 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Jetta. This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Jetta. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volkswagen Jetta has
| |