Volvo S60 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is larger, but lower. Volvo S60 is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1034 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S60 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |