Volvo S60 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007

 
Volvo S60
2005 - 2009
Mitsubishi Lancer
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 185 HP140 HP
Torque: 400 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds9.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1200 km on highway
1090 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.57 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.49 m
Volvo S60 is larger, but lower.
Volvo S60 is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Volvo S60 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo S60 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`920
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 32002800
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv