Volvo S60 2005 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 35 HP more power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Chevrolet Cruze. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Cruze engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is larger, but lower. Volvo S60 and Chevrolet Cruze are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1034 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 26 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |