Volvo S60 2004 vs Volvo S40 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 126 - 300 HP100 - 220 HP
Torque: 192 - 400 NM150 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.7 - 12 seconds6.8 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 13.04.9 - 10.0
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Volvo S60 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo S60 is 12 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litres883 litres
Volvo S60 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 151 litres).
Turning diameter: 13 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 2 metres more than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`031~ 1`928
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 32002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv