Volvo S40 2005 vs Volvo S60 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 220 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo C30, Volvo C70 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S40 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo S40 is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | 1034 litres | |
Volvo S40 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 151 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo S40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 8.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |