Volvo S40 2004 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Volvo S40 engine produces 40 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 70 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo C30, Volvo C70 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
SAAB 9-3 2007 2.0 engine: The Saab B207 engine is essentially identical to the Opel Z20NET and is based on a 2.2-liter naturally aspirated predecessor. It is a simple and reliable engine, even less demanding than its predecessor. However, it has some notable weaknesses.
The timing and balance shaft chains have a limited lifespan and often stretch before reaching 200,000 km. The ... More about SAAB 9-3 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Volvo S40 is 18 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 425 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space. Volvo S40 has 21 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 9.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |