Volvo S40 2004 vs Kia Cerato 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo S40 engine produces 21 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Kia Cerato. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 1 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 345 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S40 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |