Volvo S40 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S40 engine produces 50 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Volvo S40 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S40 is 18 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space. Volvo S40 has 21 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 9.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |