Volvo 960 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 960 engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 12.8 | |
|
The Volvo 960 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo 960 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
| |