Ford Scorpio 1997 Estate car / wagon
The right to stay on road, a strong, fast
read all Ford Scorpio reviews
This generation of Ford Scorpio has been produced from October, 1997 to September, 1998. We can provide information about 6 modifications of this generation. The car has been produced only with classical rear wheel drive.
This Ford is available with three petrol engines with displacement from 2.0 to 2.9 litres and power of from 115 to 207 horsepower un one diesel engine with displacement 2.5 litres and power of 115 HP.
The car is available with both manual (3 versions), as well as automatic (3 versions) gearbox.
Ford Scorpio 1997 estate car average fuel consumption in combined cycle for petrol engine is from 10.1 to 12.8 litres per 100km, whereas for diesel engine - from 8.5 to 10.1 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Ford Scorpio 1997 estate car petrol engine version is Ford Scorpio Wagon 2.0i, consuming 10.1 litres per 100km. While the most fuel efficient Ford Scorpio 1997 estate car diesel - Ford Scorpio Wagon 2.5 TD for 100 kilometers consumes 8.5 liters of diesel.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 9.2 seconds has Ford Scorpio Wagon 2.9i 24V version, conversely the tardiest one is Ford Scorpio Wagon 2.5 TD reaching this speed only in 13.4 seconds. The maximum top speed is 215 km/h for the 2.9 petrol 207 hp version (Ford Scorpio Wagon 2.9i 24V).
Lenght of Ford Scorpio is 483 cm, it is large car. For comparison - Ford Scorpio is about 3 cm longer than Audi A6 estate car / wagon. Ford Scorpio gross weight is from 1485 to 2000 kg (depending on modification), which is about 13 percent lighter than the average for this age and class.
Below you will find more detailed information about Ford Scorpio prices and costs.
Ford Scorpio modifications
| Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.0i
Most fuel efficient petrol version |
2.0 Petrol | 115 HP | 10.1 l/100km | Manual (5) |
|
Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.3i 16V
Most fuel efficient petrol version |
2.3 Petrol | 147 HP | 10.1 l/100km | Manual (5) |
| Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.3i 16V | 2.3 Petrol | 147 HP | 10.7 l/100km | Automatic (4) |
|
Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.5 TD
Most fuel efficient diesel version |
2.5 Diesel | 115 HP | 8.5 l/100km | Manual (5) |
| Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.5 TD | 2.5 Diesel | 115 HP | 10.1 l/100km | Automatic (4) |
|
Ford Scorpio 1997 Wagon 2.9i 24V
Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 9.2 seconds |
2.9 Petrol | 207 HP | 12.8 l/100km | Automatic (4) |
Ford Scorpio total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Ford Scorpio?
Ford Scorpio 1997 total costs of ownership calculator
Calculate total cost of ownership of the Ford Scorpio, including purchase, insurance, maintenance, taxes and other costs based on how you use your vehicle.
Ford Scorpio reliability and quality
According to yearly reports of vehicle inspection service Ford Scorpio reliability is below average. In the roadworthiness tests in 2006 defects were detected in an average of 22.9 percent of Ford Scorpio of this generation (on average 9 years old at the time of inspection). The average failure rate for a vehicles of the same age was 20%.
Similar cars to Ford Scorpio 1997
Cars similar and most compared to Ford Scorpio 1997. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- only petrol engines available
- lower fuel consumption
- better manoeuvrability
- only petrol engines available
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- fewer faults
- lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
- lower fuel consumption
- fewer faults
Ford Scorpio reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Ford Scorpio.
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 19 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 225 € (~ 112 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The right to stay on road, a strong, fast
Cons: In winter cold, low driver's seat - disrupts transparency