Volvo 960 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 2.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 204 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 267 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 10.3 seconds | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 11.1 | 8.5 - 12.8 | |
|
Volvo 960 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`060 | ~ 1`726 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |