Volkswagen Touran 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2005 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |