Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Touran engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 1029 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Volkswagen Touran has 334 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |