Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, but torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 437 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 23 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |